Mind is governed by laws which are infinitely reflexible (see index-"Nature of Existence" for further elaboration of this term). They bend elastically and in bending build up an opposed force tending to return to unstressed default positions whereas laws pertaining to matter are immediate absolutes meaning that they must be obeyed at every instant.
Laws of mind are also absolute in the sense that they cannot be altered in any way by the actions of man (neither psychologically nor genetically) because they originate in the context of the universe as a whole and are subject only to the fundamental logical principles as given herein.
By corollary from the above these rules also apply:
"One cannot escape one's own identity."
Any being has an identity, as that being, independent of his choice which cannot be
"An animal proceeds in its development until it fulfills the purpose of its design."
The actions of an animal are those it is capable of. A lion will not walk like a chicken and a bird
will not roar like a lion. They are physically constructed for much their behavior. (by corollary from the above)
"A being will continue to do what it has done in the past."
The past is the standard by which present behavior is determined. Therefore, without cause to change,
behavior will remain the same. (Continuity of identity through time)
Begin with the fetus at the stage when electrical
activity in the brain begins.
Information enters the brain via nerves which
constitute the mind/world interface. Such
information enters the brain without the presence
of a context. There is nothing in the brain to
Rather, the first input forms the context for
In a tabula rasa state the brain
absorbs information from the external world while
doing nothing with it other than filing
(information from sensory organs going to and being
filed in hardwired sights within the brain).
This must be so given the initial postulate.
Because the brain is electrical there is a hardware output..
It is the spontaneous 'firing' of
electrical signals from the brain to motor organs.
The fetus moves by unwilled muscular contractions.
Such spontaneous motion creates a secondary input. (e.g.
As the hand moves in the amniotic fluid the motion
is sensed generating a new source of information.)
There are then two types of information being
generated: simple external and self-generated
At some time these two are identified by the
brain (classified as separate types).
The development of context is sensual The
classification of two types of sensual data is
perceptual. The first two percepts formed are
self-generated external and simple external data.
A deeper meaning of the distinction between the two
types is necessary.
Identifying the difference depends on the
contextual development of a sense of statistical
probability. For this, standards of time and space
The heartbeat is the brains hardware clock which
becomes the standard by which input is temporally
These two contexts form the basis for estimating
the probability that an arm movement (spatial
input) is logically correlated with a given
external input (the sense of fluid passing over the
arm, etc.). The coincidence or non-coincidence of
both inputs becomes a new distinction in the types
of input. i.e. double inputs which are coincidental
on a regular basis (position change of arm-input
#1: fluid flow over arm-input #2).
External inputs per heartbeat (rate of
input) is a form of contextual data stored in the
A sense of spatial displacement and position (where
an arm or leg or hand is in space relative to
default positions) also forms a context which can
be used in the discrimination of self-generated and
simple external inputs.
Percept development from contextual data is
analogous to the filling of a 'bucket' with some
When the bucket is full a percept is formed. The
bucket is a statistical function which relates the
probability that data points are logically
connected in a recurring figure. The recurring
figure is a percept. What quantity of data points
is sufficient to draw a conclusion (percept) is
determined primarily by context development.
Initial percepts are not a matter of 'on/off,
yes/no' but rather of 'more/less, probably/maybe'
(the bucket is of indeterminate size).
Percepts acquired later (example - visual percepts
not available before birth) may be increasingly
distinct because a percept forming context then
exists. The number of data points needed to
confirm a valid percept is the same as the quantity
in the already acquired context.
Thereafter, the same set of sensual inputs triggers
the percept, the use of which becomes new
contextual data which fills another bucket. When a
'set of perceptions' bucket is filled another
percept is formed.
This is the fundamental function of the mind: the
creation of a hierarchical structure of percepts.
And the empirical method used (accumulated
experience) may be termed 'free induction' No
mental 'effort' is required by this method.
Consciousness presupposes the development of
context and begins with the creation of the first
percept: the identification of self-generated as
opposed to simple external input.
The embodiment of self identification is willed
action, i.e. initial non-spontaneous movement.
Such willed action differs from the random motion
of the fetus due to spontaneous electrical
discharges by the quantity of motion per unit time
or spatially more extensive movements per unit
space. Thus, if there were ten spontaneous
movements per unit time in general. and then a
sudden increase to one hundred movements per unit
time, the rate increase is the quantitive identifier
Such movements are necessarily uncoordinated, there
being as yet no context for 'willed coordination'.
In accordance with the general law of existence, (see index " Nature of Existence")
"All that which exists (interacts) must have form",
an internal qualitive sensation of self comes into
existence as distinct from other sensations.
The willing of motions (quantitive) and experience
of self (qualitive) are logically congruent.
The initial occurence of both is 'orgasm', the
meaning of which is simply "I am" or "I exist
relative to and separate from all other types of
The exact instant when a fetus becomes conscious is
in theory observable.
The proper definition of consciousness in a fully
developed entity is the focus of the mind's
This may be understood by analogy with audio
speakers. By adjusting the balance, the apparent
source of the sound moves between two speakers.
Let the speakers be increased in number and
replaced by activated percepts or 'concepts' (to be
further discussed). Consciousness is the focus of
all of these in the same manner but in an imaginary
The sensation of consciousness is logically
congruent with the material of the brain but is not
itself that material.
To understand this let a brain be flattened on an
extremely large smooth surface with all connections
intact so that the individuals brain cells and
connections can be enlarged.
Replace every cell
with some logically equivalent mechanical device
(something somewhat more complicated than mouse
traps with strings). Assuming a mechanical voice and ear
analog have also been constructed, will it be
possible to converse with the machine?
The answer must be yes for if no, at what point in
the replacement procedure is consciousness lost?
At no time was any substantial change made. The
constructive substance is always the same (matter).
Consciousness is the embodiment of the percept
'self' (as the activity of the brain).
Other such embodiments are color, taste. smell.
etc.. Clearly, the detection of a certain
wavelength of light must appear to the self in some
form. Any form whatsoever is possible that is
consistent with quantitive material data.
What appears 'red' to one observer may appear
altogether different to another but both will call
it red having learned to do so by mutual agreement.
Such qualities 'exist' in compliance with the
general law of existence which requires form.
Therefore, the 'form' of a photon is wavelength
while the 'form of the perception of wavelength is
The qualities of sensation in any being are
constrained in two ways. They must be internally
consistent as well as quantitively consistent with
The term percept or concept used herein denotes "An
accumulation of related facts and/or processes to
which a symbol (representational or abstract) is
When a percept is activated by sensory data it
evokes a symbol of that data. Thus, a dog has a
percept 'man' (a mental picture with two arms, two
legs, a head and a certain smell but with
The perceptual symbol is the 'form' of the percept
as required by the law of embodiment.
Concepts involve the recognition of the process of
percept symbolism and subsequent advancement to
abstract symbolism. (Note: The act of forming
percepts is contextual data.)
A concept is, in part, a percept with an abstract
rather than a representational form.
Thus, an animal which ponders non-physical
principles requires the abstract tools with which
to think abstractly, i.e. language, mathematical
symbols, etc. as well as a 'standard of abstract
symbolism' (to be further discussed).
A man without a symbolic language is qualitively no
better than a dog or any other animal except that
he possesses the capacity to develop it.
Man is that animal which consciously grasps the
function of his mind and seeks to augment it by
empiricalization and rationalization.
Empiricalization is the active, willed collection of
facts from the external environment.
Rationalization is the formation of empirically
That is, a man (in forming concepts) attempts to:
Place a symbol on an unfilled 'bucket'.
Extrapolate (guess) the structure and
relationships of percept(s) from the contents of
that unfilled bucket.
Discern a recurring figure from fewer data
points than the number dictated by the empirically
obtained context for 'degree of probability'.
This function is forced induction and requires
The effort consists of concentration which is the
holding of the mind's focus on a specific subject
(unworded thought). In the absence of effort the
focus wanders, being continually buffetted by
external data. Thus, 'thinking' requires the
cutting off of some external input. (Or, thought
is 'constrained' mental activity - selective and
Random wandering of the focus is the default
condition of the mind. This must be so in order to
detect a threat, food, etc . The brain scans the
environment for important data. But it must be
able to hold the focus in order to meet the threat
or catch the food.
All animals 'concentrate' on external input.
A human (that which is like a man but not quite a man) does it with internal concepts (deduction).
A man concentrates in the process of forced
There are three fundamental levels of forced
First degree forced induction is what an artist
does while drawing a picture.
The last is most difficult because, in principle,
it is without formal methodology.
Its meaning is roughly this:
Given a system of one billion combinations of which
only one million are desirable, find one.
Second degree forced induction is what a scientist
Its meaning is:
Given a system of one billion possibilities and one
unique solution, find that one.
Third degree forced induction is what a research
Its meaning is:
Construct a System or process which will account
for the one billion possibilities.
The difficulty of the second lies in learning the
discipline of experimentation.
The first requires an approximation with successive
improvements acting as the guide to further
Note: Induction and deduction are inseparable
in practice (deduction being the conscious
mechanism of verifying induction).
Free induction occurs with only the effort required
by random external data collection.
probability of accuracy is high. It requires much
time because new percepts cannot be formed until
all the 'buckets' they subsume have been filled.
Rationalization (forced induction) requires the
greater mental effort of concentration.
probability of accuracy is low. It requires much
less time because subsumed buckets are unfilled.
Note: 'Effort' is congruent with and is the
identity of taking the mind out of its default
state and putting it into a reflexible condition (see index "Nature of Existence").
The concept of speculation is a prominent part of
rationalization. The low success rate of forced
induction can be better understood by examination
of this aspect.
First degree speculation is the choice of a
solution from the first spectrum of possibilities.
Second degree speculation is the choice selected
from the second spectrum which depends on the first
Third degree depends on the second and so on.
By way of example, the probability of successful
deduction to the 3rd level is 1/1000 if there are
10 possibilities in each spectrum. To insure successful free induction 1000 filled
buckets are required.
Despite the low success rate of rationalization,
when combined with empiricalization it provides the
greater success rate.
In this manner:
If there are 10 possibilities in a spectrum, it is
most probable that the correct answer will be
obtained by 'trying' (testing by experiment) only
five of them on average before the truth is found.
The resultant success of forced induction is better
than free induction by a factor 2^n where 'n' is the
degree of speculation.
Recall also that the buckets 'tried' are unfilled.
Note: An unfilled bucket is not a percept. When
identified as a member of a spectrum it is an
'idea', i.e. a candidate for percept formation.
Abstract principles once proven can be employed in
other circumstances where they are logically
constrained (deduction) without necessity of
experimentation. It is therefore possible to
'learn' without verification from a 'teacher'
resulting in a primarily deductive entity (a human).
Both pleasure and pain, divorced from acquired
context, are meaningless electrical signals
entering the brain. They become meaningful only by
comparison to standards of pleasure and pain.
The standard of pleasure is fixed in the womb.
Contextual, stored data consists of warmth,
softness, quiet. etc.. If the womb were
constructed of sharp objects what is called pain
would be the standard of pleasure. But if this
were so the fetus would be torn apart. The
standard of pleasure is as it is out of logical
Pain is then a deviation from the acquired context.
The sensation of pleasure cannot be separated from
the sensation of pain. If nothing is compared to
the standard and found to be in opposition, that
standard is not experienced as pleasure. It would
be experienced simply as the unacknowledged
'normal' contextual state. What a sensation is, is
equally dependent on what it is not.
The standard of pleasure is therefore validated by
comparison to pain. The initial incidence of
validation is birth trauma, i.e. the introduction
of an excessive non-contextual differential (one
which cannot be described as 'contextual
The primary standard is pleasure while the
experience of pain forms a secondary standard.
That standard most reinforced is the preferred form
(prlmary) of experience to the individual entity.
Thus, an individual may seek pain in the
exceptional case but such 'deviant' behavior is
inconsistent with the maintenance of life.
The standard of perception is 'orgasm', i e. the
initial acquisition of 'self' as well as the
initial percept formation. All subsequent percept
formation is compared to the initial percept and is
experienced as a sense of 'correctness' or
'incorrectness'. (The comparison consists
quantitively in the number of data points used: and
qualitively as 'correctness'. )
Because percepts are the result of free induction,
they are unlikely to be false. Therefore, the
sense of correctness is weakened by the absence of
a context for falseness, (vis. the experience of
pleasure is weakened if there are very few painful
experiences and is most pronounced when the number
of painful experiences is 1/2 of the number of
pleasurable ones. (Pleasure cannot be sensed as
pleasure in the total absence of pain. But if the
pleasure/pain ratio is 1:1 neither is favorable,
i.e. cannot be assigned the term pleasure in the
sense of 'preferred'. See index "Nature of Existence-#Logical Principles- Preference and Distinction.)
The sensual and perceptual standards are utilized
by natural selection for species reproduction.
Stimulation of sex organs (which are provided with
extra sensory receptors) causes consciousness to be
concentrated. Concentration means that the object
not being concentrated on 'disappears' from the
attention of the concentrating entity. Those
percepts most reinforced are the default states of
concentration. That is, if there is nothing in
particular to concentrate on, the act of
concentrating will rest on those percepts most
reinforced (important). These are the standards of
pleasure and inductive correctness.
When all percepts except those two standards have
disappeared from attention, orgasm occurs.
That is, the entity experiences first the standard of
pleasure then that of 'self' then again pleasure
on the return to normal status.
A conceptual standard exists only in man and is commonly
referred to as a 'soul'. It is the first
successful result of forced induction acquired in
the first years of life and thereafter reinforced
by every attempt at forced induction to which it is
Because forced induction has a low success
probability, the conceptual standard has a
pleasure/pain element analogous to the sensual
The necessary preexisting context for forced
induction is a hierarchical structure of percepts
acquired by free induction. This structure is by
definition 'good' but cannot be experienced as good
until a standard of failure is acquired with which
to compare it as is the case with the sensual
Forced induction provides failure and thus
conceptual 'pain' while the preexisting structure
provides the standard of correctness which
determines the correct forced induction solution to a given question which is
then experienced as 'pleasurable'.
Hence, the first true accomplishment of forced
induction (soul) is preceded by a free induction
which partially identifies the nature of the mind's
operation to the self (assigning symbols to groups
of related facts). This is congruent with failed
attempts to consciously perform that operation by
concentration culminating in successful forced
That success is experienced as a sense of
conceptual pleasure (good) and of correctness
Repeated forced inductive failures are necessarily
taken as a reflection on the conceptual standard (soul)
because the implication of failure is that the
process of rationalization is faulty by comparison
to free induction, i.e. that feeling which is the quintessence of animalness is superior to thinking (forced induction) which determines quintessential manness.
By further implication the soul is defective. And
if that standard is defective, life as a conceptual
entity is defective. Therefore, all conceptual beings seek a validation
(reference to an external standard) of their
conceptual standard from others.
The greater the number of successful forced inductions, the lesser
is the need of external validation.
Youth seeks, primarily, validation while the adult , more
assured of his standard, seeks the exercise of his
identity, i.e. to act in accordance with his
Just as consciousness is the focus of the mind's
activity, the path taken by that focus (in an
abstract space) 'dwells' at a position centered on
the conceptual standard. The conscious activity of
a properly functioning mind passes through the
conceptual standard comparing and evaluating new
If the dwell of focus is not centered on the
conceptual standard one has 'lost one's soul'. it
remains functioning at the subconscious level.
(The subconscious is any of the parts of the mind's
activity which contribute to the focus.)
uncentered soul is a 'conscience', i.e. the
signifier of an improperly centered consciousness.
An improper focus is centered on the secondary
conceptual standard (that of inductive failure or
an invalidating experience or often on a 'master'
idea acquired from another in the course of seeking
validation). This occurs at a time of repeated
inductive failures and/or external invalidating
However, the most common disposition of the
conceptual standard is its dissolution through lack
of use. In this state the mind is seldom
concentrated on conceptual matters and
the 'unemployed' soul dissolves back into
the infinite sea of possibilities from which it
Since it is seen as no more important than
any other fact or is forgotten entirely, the
concept of moral importance is also lost.
The mind becomes a uniformity similar to that of
To exercise the conceptual standard is to use it
for comparative analysis. New information is
sorted according to its value with respect to that
standard, filing those concepts most valued close
to the soul and those least valued away.
The standard of each individual is tested against
reality being exposed to both good and bad
contained therein. Purity of soul requires only
that it be valued above all else and that the proof
of valuing be embodied in its active use.
The strength of one's soul is a determining factor
in the process of giving up in favor of the
secondary standard (along with the magnitude of
inductive failures or invalidating experiences).
That strength is dependent on the degree of
generality of the primary conceptual standard, i.e.
the extent of reality subsumed by it.
The range of one's conceptual existence is the
differential between the primary and secondary
standards. Inductive experiences, in principle, cannot
exceed the range without setting a new conceptual
The concept of evil is applicable to conceptual
beings only. It is the conscious attempt to
obliterate conceptual nature which is seen to be
defective and is perpetrated by those with an improper
focus 'haunted' by a conscience. This causes
conceptual pain and guilt because the new
center of focus has the same function as the soul
and to knowingly give up one's soul is conceptual
The only course open to such beings is to give up
the new 'conceptual self' or to obliterate all
others who have retained their primary standard
thereby 'validating' the process of giving up primary
conceptual standards. The whole of which is
logically inconsistent. (If it is improper to give
up a secondary standard, why is it proper to give
up the primary standard?)
The goal of evil is conceptually oriented and has
no physical foundation. Physical life and its
needs is not the basis of morality. (Physical
nature is the basis for political principles.)
The end sought by evil is conceptual help or termination.
Willed damage to another is an end in itself only
to those experienced beings who have knowingly
acknowledged and accepted themselves as evil.
The physical development of man is arrested so as
to maintain 'manageable' pre-adults. A two year
old child at six feet and two hundred pounds would
be an impossible burden to its parents given the
slow mental development of man. Whereas a horse at
two years is both well developed and capable of
The cause of the need for arrested development is
the size of that part of the brain of man which is
devoted to the formation of percepts and concepts.
Primary information which forms the initial context
diffuses as a 'gas' into to brain's physical
structure. But the rate of information acquisition
is similar in all mammals. A horse then has
greater information density than a man at two years.
There must then be an external 'threshold' of
viable percept formation dependent on physical
reality which is the same for all mammals. And
that threshold is reached at a critical information
density. That density is therefore reached in a
small brain prior to being reached in a large
brain. The horse advances ahead of man in free
In opposition to the former. the carrying capacity
of the brain is finite. That capacity is reached
in a horse long before it is reached in man. (Or,
the capacity limit slows the rate of information
accumulation / processing.)
Because the intelligence of an animal is measured
primarily by the amount of reality subsumed by its
percepts or concepts, the larger percept forming
brain is congruent with the more intelligent animal
which is then increasingly more viable when tested
A child is suspended in trust of his parent. He
knows that he does not know what to do to fulfill
his needs and desires He recognizes that capacity
in the parent and at later stages understands that
some 'facts' learned from or taught by the parent
are false as well. But a child is required to
accept all as truth because he does not yet possess
the capacity to accurately separate true from
When the brain is sufficiently full of contextual
information and free induction percepts, it is
ready for independent existence while natural
selection causes reproductive ability to coincide
with that independence.
A child does not want independent existence. He
knows he cannot maintain it.
An adult does not want dependent existence,
preferring instead to exercise his identity.
Oscillations between these two states are chaotic
as believed 'untruths' received from the parent are
discarded and new 'truths' adopted, thereby
embodying independent existence.
Adolescence is outwardly more difficult for the
male because the female retains the option of
remaining physically dependent on the male.
Inwardly the female has the difficulty of remaining
pschologically independent in order to establish a
credible 'standard of validation' upon which the
Awareness of sex, both physical and conceptual (as
validation of conceptual standards), causes the
female to differentiate herself from the male in
dress and attitude (bifurcation) while the dominant
male selects on the basis of such differences
thereby perpetuating them.
The primary purpose of sex is to increase the rate
of genetic adaptation to changing environment. But
the psychological aspects of male / female are
independent of genetics in accordance with the
In a hypothetical all male or all female
population, by the conceptual nature of man, it is
necessary that the population split into distinct
male and female elements. The reason being the
adopted psychological roles of male / female which
exist in response to the requirements of external
reality [the maintenance and value of physical and
The adoptive purpose of man is then to make life possible
while that of the woman is to make life worth
living. The existence of an individual cannot be
maintained indefinitely in the absence of either.
The male psychology is congruent with the greater
ability to deal with the physical aspects of life.
It is characteristically quantative.
The female psychology is congruent with lesser
physical strength but greater learned capacity to
validate proper inductive standards. It is
By the initial postulate neither physical male nor
female is necessarily the carrier of psychological
male or female. The physical being is the default
condition of its related psychology. That is, the
stronger body most often takes the dominant
psychology (male) while the weaker body (female)
takes the remaining submissive alternative.
The embodiment of the identity of each is the
expression of dominance by the male and submission
by the female.
Psychological male / female is present by degrees in
every individual but cannot be entirely embodied in
all individuals equally because the identity of
each parameter is violated as was the case with
matter (quantative and qualitive numbers). In
matter it would constitute an impossible 'immediate
absolute' violation. But in man the temporarily
allowable violation is one of 'reflexibility'.
The conceptual standards of male and female reflect
the bias perpetuated by environment. The male
conceptual standard will then be predominantly
taken from the external world (extrospective) while
that of the female will derive from introspective
analysis of personal relationships.
The initial postulate demands that male / female
psychological roles are entirely learned It is
also demanded by the nature of the external
physical world that such roles cannot be largely
undone by any means whatsoever.
The identities of man and universe remain
Free will is the result of indeterminacy applied to
consciousness. The actions of an individual are
specifically unpredictable in principle.
Random external inputs and random internal
'accidentals' (physical failures of information
insulation: dying cells. cosmic rays, etc.) provide
unpredictability of form.
Unpredictability of interaction is logically
guaranteed because knowledge of the future in
principle constitutes input upon which future
action is based. It is self-referential.
Because one cannot predict one's own future action
(in a deterministic fashion), the activities of
consciousness are defined as 'free will'.
Free will is congruent with consciousness.
It follows then that the individual alone is the
responsible generator of his own willed actions
within the context of known alternatives.
It may also be understood that all discussions
concerning free will are 'academic' (without
consequence). No form of input or definition
alters the nature of man.
By the principle of indeterminacy as applied to
consciousness, it is impossible to constrain human
behavior within strictly defined limits. Hence, a
bifurcated graph of psychological male / female forms
two normal overlapping distributions where physical
characteristics determine the placement of each
individual on one or the other graph. (The overlap
of the physical graph is far less than the
Any constraint of behavior or definition of man
becomes additional self-referential input which
alters the behavior and definition. Hence. man has
a specific nature which may be defined. But that
definition once known alters (to a degree) the
beings so defined.
Nature places constraints on man which cause a
desire to learn about those constraints. But the
act of learning constrains the definition of man
(as a learning entity). This causes a desire for
random information acquisition (fun) rather than
structured information acquisition (school). These
are 'complimentary' principles. An excess of one
induces the other.
It is then impossible for living entities to remain
stationary in either the physical or psychological
In principle all men cannot be constrained to be
alike To be like all others is to lose one's
identity as the unique center of existence which
originated in infancy. To have all one's thoughts
and actions known to others is also to lose one's
identity by 'dispersal'. Hence, all individuals
seek privacy and do not divulge everything known to
them without sensing a
need to acquire new information to rebuild a
separate and distinct self.
An animal sleeps to avoid feedback.
In this manner:
External input causes processing which in turn
generates more processing because the result of the
former is internal input.
The processing result must then be prevented from
causing additional internal processing or the entity must
shut down external input / output and become
An animal then has three principle brain functions:
To take in information from the external
environment (~1/3 of the time)
To process that data for the purpose of generating
output into the environment (~1/3 of the time)
To continue integrating new data into the
context resulting in improved processing ability (~1/3 of the time).
In the absence of sleep, suspension storage
overflows and feedback begins (hallucination).
Sleep is fundamentally the processing of the days
activities which generated internal inputs.
Because new data generates more internal input than
old already known data, infants require more
sleep. Context is not yet
established and there is no significant output. The
infant is then primarily taking in information and organizing it internally (and little else)
requiring half time (or more) sleep cycles.
Conversely elderly people require less sleep because the days experiences do not significantly require alteration of their already developed context.
External reality is the primary constraint guiding
physical and mental development. Hence, genetic
constructs to control the development and activity
of mind beyond what is physically necessary are
(In man even a sucking reflex is learned, vis. the
position of the thumb makes fetal insertion into its
mouth statistically obvious while pulling the thumb
out generates low pressure in the oral cavity
thereby requiring only a reversal of cause to learn
Man is the 'object' of evolution in a logical sense
with respect to external constraints. Given
elemental life forms and a gas / solid interface to
inhabit, evolution will eventually produce a
manlike creature with high mental capabilities.
Evolution then proceeds until it produces a being
capable of turning it off.
The greatest amount of time will be spent in
perfecting the elementary principles of cellular
existence. Thereafter, the evolution of great
complexity is accomplished with unexpected ease.
It is the rule of existence that major principles
present more difficulty than those they subsume.
Man learns to count in ten thousand years while the
most esoteric aspects of differential calculus are
learned in a few hundred.
The general philosophy of this work may be called
'perfect integration'. It is the belief that all
fundamental principles fit together in a faultless,
seamless, logical structure.
And that there is only one such structure.
Because man is in the universe, mind is congruent
with the physical universe (as interaction).
Therefore, existence is, as a whole, an entity
possessed of mind.
It cannot be a discreet entity
in the manner of its parts (man) but is rather a
holistic entity and the context in which discreet
|God is to universe as mind is to brain|
Logic and God are therefore congruent aspects of
existence. Logic being the quantitive, analyzable
aspect and God being that which is qualitive and
One analyzes quantities.
One contemplates qualities.
Analysis produces understanding and the means of
Contemplation produces contentment and gives
meaning to life.
Thank you for your patience and interest