and Religious Mail
A New Category - started 12/25/04
It was quite amusing to read your ruminations and speculations about UFOs and aliens, particularly your views on the supposed lack of any aesthetic sense demonstrated in their spacecraft design. Your speculations on possible propulsion systems with reference to ‘form follows function’ principles were also quite amusing.
The aesthetic sense of the many hundreds of races that have paid at least one visit to your planet is a significant reason why so few of the flyers observed by your kind give any hint of their function by their external form. However, a small number of races do prefer a ‘no frills’ design for their atmospheric flyers and they are the ones who are responsible for most of the exceptions.
The exceptions are flyers with: -
1- A saturn design with a wide, flat rim surrounding the central cabin;
2 - A flat-topped ‘hat’ design with a rim that curves downwards and away from the walls of the central cabin.
The Central Consortium, a loose alliance that controls this system, and several other systems in this sector of the Orion Arm, asks all visitors to obey a few rules. One of the rules is a request that they use an atmospheric flyer design that would not reveal any clue on how the flyer operates to an astute Earth observer. Sometimes it is not possible for them to comply, but this is only a minor rule and lack of compliance is not a matter of great concern to the Consortium.
As to the possibility that ‘anti gravity’ is used as a means of propulsion by atmospheric flyers, it should be obvious to any being capable of reason that ‘anti gravity’ cannot possibly exist.
Scientific law permits more gravity, or less gravity, all the way down to zero gravity. But that’s all.
What we do is redirect the attractive force back on itself by means of arrays of adjustable gravity screens for levitation and flight control.
As a result, the attractive gravitational force (what you call: ‘sucks’) from a massive body that would normally easily overwhelm the gravitational attractive force from the rest of the universe, and causes an object to fall in the direction of greater mass, is simply deflected by a flyer’s gravity screens back towards the source mass.
Gravity screens working in combination can focus the deflected gravitational force towards a suitable position beneath the flyer to provide lift and direction, not only to the flyer but to the atmosphere that surrounds it. The atmospheric envelope carried along with the flyer has the added benefit of acting as a heat sink during rapid atmospheric flight.
The ‘saturn’ flyer design has its screens arranged around the central cabin in the manner of a series of venetian blinds and the ‘hat’ flyer design has its screens arranged in the manner of a series of holland blinds that can be unfurled to suitable positions within the outer apron which is usually bell shaped to facilitate gravitational focus.
For all types of flyer a separate and very much less concentrated array of gravity deflector screens is installed in the flat ceiling of the central cabin to provide the crew with a standard level of gravity. It also ensures that no matter how rapidly the flyer changes direction or accelerates, no one within the cabin can be affected by external inertial forces.
Gravity screens are made with confined layers of massless particles. These are north-south monopole pairs and are similar in size to an atom. Being massless they are non reactive and are large enough to be trappable. They can be collected in large numbers and packed together in sealable cavities within flat panels to form screens that are impermeable to gravitational force.
There’s one small catch to all this.
Massless monopole pairs can only be harvested from space. They are repelled by objects that possess mass and tend to move preferentially towards sectors in space that have a low gravitational density.
Yes, we are fully aware and quite amused that your silly scientists think that a particle and its antiparticle counterpart ‘annihilate’ when they meet. They don’t. They unite with a burst of energy and release all gravitational force links to the rest of the universe to become invisible (more accurately, totally non reflective), massless particle pairs. This forms a major part of what you call ‘dark matter’.
In fact, many years ago, your silly scientists discovered at least one obvious form of dark matter in particle colliders. Instead of recognising the observation for what it was they concluded that they had managed to ‘create’ matter from something that they decided to call ‘quantum soup’.
I refer, of course, to those highly energetic collisions involving two protons. Both protons always remain intact after colliding but, once in about every three million collisions your silly scientists observed what they claimed to be a newly ‘created’ third proton plus a newly ‘created’ anti-proton fly apart in opposite directions. The newly ‘created’ anti-proton takes only a few millionths of a second to find a fourth proton with which it unites, both particles release all gravitational force links to the rest of the universe and become part of a dark matter pair again in a flash of energy or, as your silly scientists prefer to say, they ‘annihilate’.
From our perspective this particular category of dark matter, unlike monopole pairs, involves particles that are far too small to be useful to us, although they certainly contribute to the fabric of the invisible dark matter dimension (about which I will say absolutely no more).
To observe the pathetic floundering of your silly scientists trying to make sense of nature is really quite comical. They cannot tear themselves away from the blind alley of the Einsteinian version of general relativity that is summarised so well in that nonsensical circular explanation (if you can dignify it with that term): ‘mass tells space-time how to curve and space-time tells mass how to move’.
Even if your silly scientists ever manage to back themselves out of the blind alley in which they have trapped themselves the Consortium will never allow any nation on Earth to try to harvest massless monopole pairs from space until every part of your planet manages to achieve an acceptable level of civilisation.
That is the first of two reasons why I feel perfectly secure in telling you this.
The second reason?
Surely that should be obvious. It’s because you are what is known by your people as a ‘Truther’.
For the rest of your life no sane person on Earth (yes, there are some) will ever take any notice of anything that you say or anything that appears on your website.
[I don't understand any of what you said ... except "silly scientists". Is that the way members of the "Central Consortium" talk? Doesn't sound very impressive. I agree that nobody will ever believe anything I say ... so ... how about sending me a sample gravity screen that I can play with ;o) ]
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007
Had a vision in waking of an ointment oozing cyst under my arm so I googled "ball of wax" to do a little E-meditation by skimming this queary and found your site. I am of a Jungian mind when it comes to relating to the whole inner thing; the views on your site seem to have some of that kind of sensibility so I'll post it in my favorites and check it out later.
Sorry about that the only thing I have spent time on in your site is the kinky, religious email. Like I have never gone into a public toilet to read the walls in the stalls but nothing stops me if I need to go. I like the statement, He who see's gayly, has a secret wish, that's worth contemplating for the sake of wishing to BE a man however that may be.
[Well ... yah ... OK]
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007
19:06:44 -0500 (EST)
Hello sir, i love your site. can i rape your anus? it's probably pretty tight, but if we strech i think we can make it
[This "guy" cums around every few months. Same gay ... same sad story. But my ass is still spoken for.]
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007
20:18:08 -0500 (EST)
I have 7 patentable piston engine improvements coming out this year. Replacing a gear system for a crankshaft will cause much increased stress on the gears because of on and off loading on the gears. Gears are expensive. Also, this is a free piston engine which is not simple in operation. The cam or barrel type design has similarities to a type of conventional compressor. The cam followers do not roll in a straight line, therefore will slide and wear which is not so important for light duty compressor applications, but engines have a roller wear problem because of high forces. Piston support is is costly and piston side thrust is similar to the conventional rod-crank. Cost is greater than using a crankshaft. My designs are low cost, reliable, low friction and provide the desired piston dwell for each application. Hope I was of help. Look for future progress soon.
[ It wasn't of any help whatsoever. Where is the picture? Do you really think I can tell what you're talking about from what you said? You're on the tail end of internal combustion engines. I think they will go obsolete in the next couple of decades.]
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007
19:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Your young picture reminds me of a young Jeff Koons. Now i dont know wether to masturbate to your photo or his ceramic of Michael Jackson and Bubbles
[Stick with Bubbles but leave the Gloved One alone ... unless you're "Moon-a-bating"]
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006
01:34:11 -0500 (EST)
been there .. i haven't settled no hate just love .. that your ordeal is over .. my is just beginning oxycodene makes everyone sexy ...
[The Day that will live in Infamy ?? Hunh?]
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006
15:39:21 -0500 (EST)
It's yours to take, the red pill or the blue pill. Open your eyes and eat from the tree of life, or go back to sleep.
[I think this is a religious comment. Possibly a Christian on 'ludes.]
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006
19:43:22 -0400 (EDT)
[Not good. Letter to short ... and ... I don't want my comp-screen to get sticky.]
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006
07:14:43 -0400 (EDT)
Bow down to MY DICK!
[Be glad to ... if anybody can find it!]
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006
05:21:14 -0500 (EST)
boss , i want to inform others through u that there is no doubt that ufo people have very advanced in technology than us .if our science cant able to understand there technology ,that is our problem.why we r thinking that we are alone in the universe.?honestly ,u can make fool to 1 or 2 people, not everybody in the universe.second thing is that what r they want from us .the ans wer of this question is very simple. nothing.third question is that why they donot contact with us?the answer is very simple.have ever tried to talk with any monkey?no. then why.boss u have to obey that there technology is very fast that us.
[Now, that's what I call kinky ... or ... is it?]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005
22:42:55 -0500 (EST)
I LOVE U!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAVE YOU SEEN U LATELY? i KNOW HE;S GOT TO AROUYND HERE SOMEWHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I ovve you, uo turd! will you buck fuck me your my GOD! I worship you@ can I eat your shit? you belong to me when did you lose your penis (brain) ? will uy fuxck my cat with a pencil>? your a loser of crap (excremint) I LOVE YOUcOULD i HAVE YOU R BABY? COUD I FUCK YOUR NOSE?
[Sheesh ... the unspeakable punkuation!!! ... but thanks for ending the drought. I look forward to more "seminal" messages from you in the future. Again, thanks a buttload]
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005
11:24:57 -0400 (EDT)
Great Site: Thanks . . . a Quote: Radical ideas threatening institutions soon become institutions threatened by radical ideas. I think therefore, I am confused by dogma, I think . . . God is the glue that hold atoms together
[I ... don't ... quite ... get that ... but I guess ... it's a ... compliment?]
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005
22:37:00 -0400 (EDT)
Is your refriegerator running, cause if it is, ir probably runs like you, very homosexually. But in all seriousness, after a thurough survey of your writings, I can conclude only that you are homosexual and like gay sex.
[He who sees 'gayly' pursues his secret wishes]
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005
22:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
The Absolute of Reality is Existance. Let me say abstractly, that I can not say exactly what I mean. In the Attempt to explain and you divide the whole and reality becomes abstract and abstractions often lead away from the truth of Reality, Existance. The first phrase resaid in the words of the abstract, God is God. It is not for Man to understand with the mind but to accept with the heart the Grace of God. Not to say your not to play in the sand box (which is a lot of fun). It is just to say to not waste you time pondering why it is here. The finite can not comprehend the infinite and deals with it's existance in general abstractions (Yes Nothing is an entity of Existance). Your so close. And yes I an all knowing megalomaniac who is totally out of mind knowing Nothing.
[Okaaaayyyy ... uh ... yup ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005
18:58:28 -0500 (EST)
uunhh uunhh unhhh uh.hhaaa..aaa..........$5 please
[Interesting ... who's supposed to be the female? Or, what? That's the problem with kinky stuff. I can't figure it out unambiguously.]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005
17:38:07 -0500 (EST)
Oh My God.
[I have no idea if that's hate or love :o| ... so, it's kinky!]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005
05:28:12 -0500 (EST)
I hope I get to meet you in the bathouses of heaven and share my personal parts with your brain. Your site gives me a boner.
[ Bon Apetite]
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004
15:39:28 -0500 (EST)
I just wanted to say that I Love You. My cream-filled dreams of you are nothing less than ecstatic, filled even further with buckets of Jesus' loving cream. Can heaven be so perfect?
[And Merry Christmas to you too, Kinky. Actually, this doesn't seem like hatemail but it's not really complimentary either. I guess I may have to start a new email type.]